Please, not another education reform wave!

0 comments

Posted on 3rd November 2010 by Judy Breck in Next | Obamaschool | Schools we now have

, ,

This morning politicians are peppering their purported plans for the post-election with doing something about the public (government) education at local, state, and federal level that is failing yet another generation of children. These promises are look-good, feel-good for politicians, but they never work because they keep trying to make relevant something obsolete.

Remember some of the older main waves? George H.W. Bush proclaimed himself “The Education President.” Reagan launched the private sector partnerships initiative, Clinton issued his Call to Action for American Education, and then G.W. Bush implemented No Child Left Behind. Obama is calling his program to save schooling The Race to the Top.

Certainly, enormous good will and deep concern go into these efforts, but do be wary of wasting such things down this frustrating path. Anyone considering becoming a post-2010 edu-reformer should read this WaPo article titled School reform’s meager results, written by Robert J. Samuelson when school started this year. The article gives lots of facts like these:

Since the 1960s, waves of “reform” haven’t produced meaningful achievement gains. The most reliable tests are given by the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). The reading and math tests, graded on a 0-500 scale, measure 9-year-olds, 13-year-olds and 17-year-olds. In 1971, the initial year for the reading test, the average score for 17-year-olds was 285; in 2008, the average score was 286. The math test started in 1973, when 17-year-olds averaged 304; in 2008, the average was 306.

Another wave of reform efforts toward established education will sputter away as well.

The extremely good news is that a new way for a learner to individually engage knowledge is about to replace the traditional education establishment role of doling out what they are supposed to learn. Children will enter schools having mastered their 3Rs using smart mobile apps. Cardboard arithmetic flash cards will seem silly to them next to what the touch screen in their pocket offers. The internet browser an older student carries will access superior subject knowledge to that watered down for school textbooks, and do so connected to full cognitive context. The college student uses his browser to connect to the best version anywhere of anything he needs or wants to know. The effect of this knowledge emerging to an individual browser is that the student learns the most authentic, recent, and complete version of that knowledge anywhere — because of the golden swamp effect. Education will finally be doing the same thing Amazon.com does to place the item you want front and center on your screen.

If you feel like making education better today, avoid getting sidetracked by political promisers. Instead, start working on some of these steps that boost the next generation of kids to their ride on the real learning wave of the future — that is about to break over failed analog education and deliver youngsters into the global golden age of learning:

Get individual mobile devices to the kids in your family, and in your town. Make sure the devices are controlled by the student and not a school.

Provide learning apps for little kids

Make sure the older ones have devices with internet browsers

Support projects that paint your locality, and the planet, with wireless

There will be more steps presented here soon, and in my new eBook, which I hope to have online before Thanksgiving. Working title: The Golden Swamp Effect

Is the focus on school reform big pots of stimulus money?

0 comments

Posted on 13th February 2010 by Judy Breck in Mobiles | Obamaschool | Politics | Schools we now have

, , ,

Did you feel I was unduly skeptical of good efforts in my post today about the Do school differently report? There is justification for skepticism if the focus now in education reform is on pots of money. If money is there for the taking, does the availability of still more billions gushing toward education justify once again costly, time-consuming programs aimed at making over schooling? The eSchool introductory article on which I based my post about the Do school differently report includes these lines:

One of the report’s biggest strengths is that it includes a good amount of detail on how the federal government and other players might help bring about a change in STEM education, said Elena Silva, a senior policy analyst with Education Sector, a Washington, D.C., think tank.

Although not all of its recommendations are new–people have been advocating for better STEM education and the need to be globally competitive for a number of years, Silva said–its timing is well-planned.

The report “takes advantage of the fact that we have big pots of stimulus money to be spent,” Silva said. “People are looking for roadmaps.”